First Trimester Use of Buprenorphine or Methadone and the Risk of Congenital Malformations.

Importance: Use of buprenorphine or methadone to treat opioid use disorder is recommended in pregnancy; however, their teratogenic potential is largely unknown. Objective: To compare the risk of congenital malformations following in utero exposure to buprenorphine vs methadone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used health care utilization data from publicly insured Medicaid beneficiaries in the US from 2000 to 2018. A total of 13 360 pregnancies with enrollment from 90 days prior to pregnancy start through 1 month after delivery and first trimester use of buprenorphine or methadone were included and linked to infants. Data were analyzed from July to December 2022. Exposure: A pharmacy dispensing of buprenorphine or a code for administration of methadone in the first trimester. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included major malformations overall and malformations previously associated with opioids (any cardiac malformations, ventricular septal defect, secundum atrial septal defect/nonprematurity-related patent foramen ovale, neural tube defects, clubfoot, and oral clefts). Secondary outcomes included other organ system-specific malformations. Risk differences and risk ratios (RRs) were estimated comparing buprenorphine with methadone, adjusting for confounders with propensity score overlap weights. Results: The cohort included 9514 pregnancies with first-trimester buprenorphine exposure (mean [SD] maternal age, 28.4 [4.6] years) and 3846 with methadone exposure (mean [SD] maternal age, 28.8 [4.7] years). The risk of malformations overall was 50.9 (95% CI, 46.5-55.3) per 1000 pregnancies for buprenorphine and 60.6 (95% CI, 53.0-68.1) per 1000 pregnancies for methadone. After confounding adjustment, buprenorphine was associated with a lower risk of malformations compared with methadone (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97). Risk was lower with buprenorphine for cardiac malformations (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.85), including both ventricular septal defect (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98) and secundum atrial septal defect/nonprematurity-related patent foramen ovale (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97), oral clefts (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35-1.19), and clubfoot (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). Results for neural tube defects were uncertain given low event counts. In secondary analyses, buprenorphine was associated with a decreased risk of central nervous system, urinary, and limb malformations but a greater risk of gastrointestinal malformations compared with methadone. These findings were consistent in sensitivity and bias analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the risk of most malformations previously associated with opioid exposure was lower in buprenorphine-exposed infants compared with methadone-exposed infants, independent of measured confounders. Malformation risk is one factor that informs the individualized patient decision regarding medications for opioid use disorder in pregnancy.

Study design and rationale of COMPETE: Comparison of the effect of medication therapy in alleviating migraine with patent foramen ovale.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined the impact of antithrombotic agents on Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) in relation to migraine. However, differences in effectiveness of different antithrombotic agents and traditional migraine medications are not known. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is an investigator-initiated, randomized, multicenter, single-masked (outcomes assessor), and active-controlled parallel-group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05546320), with the objective of evaluating the prevention efficacy of antithrombotic agents compared to first-line migraine medication in PFO patients. The trial involves 1,000 migraine patients with a right-to-left shunt at the atrial level, randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to receive either aspirin 300 mg QD, clopidogrel 75 mg QD, rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, or the active-control metoprolol 25 mg BID. The primary efficacy end point is the response rate, defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the average migraine attack days per month or in the average number of migraine attacks per month at 12-week visit compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The COMPETE trial aims to provide valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of antithrombotic agents and standard migraine therapies in patients with PFO. This study holds the promise of advancing treatment approaches for individuals having migraines associated with PFO, thus addressing an important gap in current migraine management strategies.

Impact of the antiplatelet strategy following patent foramen ovale percutaneous closure.

AIMS: Temporary dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended following patent foramen ovale (PFO) percutaneous closure although its benefit, compared to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), has not been demonstrated in this setting. We aimed at assessing outcomes following PFO closure according to the antiplatelet strategy at discharge. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ambispective AIR-FORCE cohort included consecutive patients from seven centres in France and Canada undergoing PFO closure and discharged without anticoagulation. Patients treated in French and Canadian centres were mostly discharged with DAPT and SAPT, respectively. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, myocardial infarction, or BARC type ≥2 bleeding with up to 5 years of follow-up. The impact of the antiplatelet strategy on outcomes was evaluated with a marginal Cox model (cluster analyses per country) with inverse probability weighting according to propensity score. A total of 1532 patients (42.2% female, median age: 49 [40-57] years) were included from 2001 to 2022, of whom 599 (39.1%) were discharged with SAPT and 933 (60.9%) with DAPT, for ≤3 months in 894/923 (96.9%) cases. After a median follow-up of 2.4 [1.1-4.4] years, a total of 58 events were observed. In the weighted analysis, the rate of the primary endpoint up to 5 years was 7.8% in the SAPT strategy and 7.3% in the DAPT strategy (weighted hazard ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.59-1.83). CONCLUSION: The antiplatelet strategy following PFO closure did not seem to impact clinical outcomes, thus challenging the current recommendations of temporary DAPT.

Residual Right-to-Left-Shunt Following Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: The Role of Antithrombotic Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a highly effective therapy for patients with left circulation thromboembolism, not attributable to other conditions. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cohort study investigates the impact of baseline foramen ovale anatomy on the severity of the postclosure shunt. METHODS: Patients with PFO, who underwent percutaneous closure, were followed up for at least 5 years postimplantation. Patients were classified into two groups based on the presence of high-risk features of the baseline PFO anatomy. At the follow-up follow-up, residual right-to-left shunt was assessed for the high and non-highrisk anatomy groups, via transcranial Doppler at rest and after performing the Valsalva maneuver, with the injection of agitated saline. RESULTS: 38 patients were examined after a mean follow-up period of 9 ± 3 years after implantation. After retrospective evaluation of the baseline transthoracic and transesophageal echo studies, 14 patients with high-risk PFO anatomy were identified. The degree of the residual right-to-left shunt, as assessed by the number of microbubbles was higher in the high-risk PFO anatomy group compared to the non-high-risk group, both at rest [1.50 (IQR: 0.00-3.25) vs. 0.00 (IQR: 0.00-0.00), p < 0.001] and post-Valsalva maneuver [7.50 (IQR: 1.50- 10.25) vs. 0.00 (IQR: 0.00-3.75), p = 0.003]. Furthermore, in the high-risk group, more microbubbles were detected at rest (p = 0.008) and post-Valsalva (p = 0.002) in subjects without antiplatelet treatment compared to subjects on prolonged antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSION: Baseline PFO anatomy affects the severity of the residual right-to-left shunt. Prolonged antiplatelet therapy may benefit patients with high-risk anatomical features.

Dabigatran versus aspirin for stroke prevention after cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment for stroke prevention in cryptogenic stroke (CS) patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) remains inconclusive. We compared the efficacy and safety of dabigatran with aspirin on stroke prevention for patients with recent CS and PFO. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we randomly assigned patients with PFO who had a cryptogenic stroke, in a 1:1 ratio, to dabigatran or aspirin group. Patients were followed for 2 years and the primary efficacy outcome was the recurrence of stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was occurrence of bleeding complications. RESULTS: A total of 375 patients were enrolled in the study, 188 assigned to the dabigatran group and 187 to the aspirin group. During the 2-year follow-up, the primary efficacy outcomes occurred in 4 patients in the dabigatran group (annualized rate, 2.0%) and 11 patients in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 5.1%) (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.98; P = 0.049). TIA/acute ischemic stroke occurred in 3 patients in the dabigatran group and 8 patients in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.95; P = 0.039). Bleeding complications occurred in 8 patients in the dabigatran group (annualized rate, 3.9%) and in 7 patients in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 3.5%) (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.52; P = 0.886). CONCLUSION: For cryptogenic stroke with PFO, dabigatran was superior to aspirin for stroke prevention. There is no increased risk of bleeding complication with dabigatran.

Oral anticoagulants vs antiplatelets in cryptogenic stroke with potential cardiac emboli: Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The best antithrombotic strategy for cryptogenic stroke with potential cardiac emboli is not known. The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants (OACs) vs. antiplatelet therapies in these patients METHODS: Pubmed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from January 1980 to April 2021 to identify trials comparing OACs versus antiplatelet therapies in patients with cryptogenic stroke and potential cardiac emboli (patent foramen ovale, moderate-severe left atrial enlargement, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction). Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence (CI) was used as a measure of the effect of OACs versus antiplatelet therapies on recurrent ischemic stroke and major bleeding. We computed a random-effect estimate based on the Mantel-Haenszel method for a given outcome. RESULTS: We identified 6 studies derived from 5 trials with 2282 patients. Pooled results from 6 studies showed that compared with antiplatelet therapies, OACs were associated with a lower risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91, P=0.02). Only 3 studies of cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale reported a major bleeding endpoint and pooled results from random-effects model showed that OACs compared with antiplatelet therapies were associated with a non-significantly increased risk of major bleeding (RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.76 to 3.40, P=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: OACs compared with antiplatelet therapies were associated with a reduced recurrent ischemic stroke risk and OACs might be a viable non-procedural alternative in patients with cryptogenic stroke and potential cardiac emboli.

Towards personalized antithrombotic management with drugs and devices across the cardiovascular spectrum.

Intravascular thrombus formation and embolization are among the most frequent events leading to a number of cardiovascular conditions with high morbidity and mortality. The underlying causes are stasis of the circulating blood, genetic and acquired coagulation disorders, and reduced antithrombotic or prothrombotic properties of the vascular wall (Virchow's triad). In the venous system, intravascular thrombi can cause venous thrombosis and pulmonary and even peripheral embolism including ischaemic stroke [through a patent foramen ovale (PFO)]. Thrombi in the left atrium and its appendage or ventricle form in the context of atrial fibrillation and infarction, respectively. Furthermore, thrombi can form on native or prosthetic aortic valves, within the aorta (in particular at sites of ulcers, aortic dissection, and abdominal aneurysms), and in cerebral and peripheral arteries causing stroke and critical limb ischaemia, respectively. Finally, thrombotic occlusion may occur in arteries supplying vital organs such the heart, brain, kidney, and extremities. Thrombus formation and embolization can be managed with anticoagulants and devices depending on where they form and embolize and on patient characteristics. Vitamin K antagonists are preferred in patients with mechanical valves, while novel oral anticoagulants are first choice in most other cardiovascular conditions, in particular venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation. As anticoagulants are associated with a risk of bleeding, devices such as occluders of a PFO or the left atrial appendage are preferred in patients with an increased bleeding risk. Platelet inhibitors such as aspirin and/or P2Y12 antagonists are preferred in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease, stroke, and peripheral artery disease either alone or in combination depending on the clinical condition. A differential and personalized use of anticoagulants, platelet inhibitors, and devices is recommended and reviewed in this article.

Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in an Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Stroke.

Importance: Patent foramen ovale (PFO)-associated strokes comprise approximately 10% of ischemic strokes in adults aged 18 to 60 years. While device closure decreases stroke recurrence risk overall, the best treatment for any individual is often unclear. Objective: To evaluate heterogeneity of treatment effect of PFO closure on stroke recurrence based on previously developed scoring systems. Design, Setting, and Participants: Investigators for the Systematic, Collaborative, PFO Closure Evaluation (SCOPE) Consortium pooled individual patient data from all 6 randomized clinical trials that compared PFO closure plus medical therapy vs medical therapy alone in patients with PFO-associated stroke, and included a total of 3740 participants. The trials were conducted worldwide from 2000 to 2017. Exposures: PFO closure plus medical therapy vs medical therapy alone. Subgroup analyses used the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Score (a 10-point scoring system in which higher scores reflect younger age and the absence of vascular risk factors) and the PFO-Associated Stroke Causal Likelihood (PASCAL) Classification System, which combines the RoPE Score with high-risk PFO features (either an atrial septal aneurysm or a large-sized shunt) to classify patients into 3 categories of causal relatedness: unlikely, possible, and probable. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ischemic stroke. Results: Over a median follow-up of 57 months (IQR, 24-64), 121 outcomes occurred in 3740 patients. The annualized incidence of stroke with medical therapy was 1.09% (95% CI, 0.88%-1.36%) and with device closure was 0.47% (95% CI, 0.35%-0.65%) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.41 [95% CI, 0.28-0.60]). The subgroup analyses showed statistically significant interaction effects. Patients with low vs high RoPE Score had HRs of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-1.00) and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.11-0.42), respectively (P for interaction = .02). Patients classified as unlikely, possible, and probable using the PASCAL Classification System had HRs of 1.14 (95% CI, 0.53-2.46), 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22-0.65), and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.03-0.35), respectively (P for interaction = .003). The 2-year absolute risk reduction was -0.7% (95% CI, -4.0% to 2.6%), 2.1% (95% CI, 0.6%-3.6%), and 2.1% (95% CI, 0.9%-3.4%) in the unlikely, possible, and probable PASCAL categories, respectively. Device-associated adverse events were generally higher among patients classified as unlikely; the absolute risk increases in atrial fibrillation beyond day 45 after randomization with a device were 4.41% (95% CI, 1.02% to 7.80%), 1.53% (95% CI, 0.33% to 2.72%), and 0.65% (95% CI, -0.41% to 1.71%) in the unlikely, possible, and probable PASCAL categories, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients aged 18 to 60 years with PFO-associated stroke, risk reduction for recurrent stroke with device closure varied across groups classified by their probabilities that the stroke was causally related to the PFO. Application of this classification system has the potential to guide individualized decision-making.

Secondary stroke prevention in patients with patent foramen ovale.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an established risk factor for cryptogenic ischemic stroke, strategies for secondary prevention remain controversial. Increasing evidence over the past decade from well designed clinical trials supports transcatheter PFO closure for selected patients whose stroke was likely attributable to the PFO. However, patient selection using imaging findings, clinical scoring systems, and in some cases, thrombophilia testing, is crucial for determining patients most likely to benefit from closure, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have found that patients with a high Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score and those with a thrombophilia benefit more from closure than medical therapy (including antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy) alone. Meta-analyses have demonstrated an increased short-term risk of atrial fibrillation in closure patients, and that residual shunt after closure predicts stroke recurrence. Last, recent data have been inconclusive as to whether patients receiving medical therapy only benefit more from anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, so this remains an area of controversy. SUMMARY: Transcatheter PFO closure is an evidence-based, guideline-supported therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with a PFO and cryptogenic stroke. However, proper patient selection is critical to achieve benefit, and recent studies have helped clarify those patients most likely to benefit from closure.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Stroke Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.

Prevention of ischemic stroke relies on the use of antithrombotic medications comprising antiplatelet agents and anticoagulation. Stroke risk is particularly high in patients with cardiovascular disease. This review will focus on the role of antithrombotic therapies in the context of different types of cardiovascular disease. We will discuss oral antiplatelet medications and both IV and parental anticoagulants. Different kinds of cardiovascular disease contribute to stroke via distinct pathophysiological mechanisms, and the optimal treatment for each varies accordingly. We will explore the mechanism of stroke and evidence for antithrombotic therapy in the following conditions: atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart values (mechanical and bioprosthetic), aortic arch atherosclerosis, congestive heart failure (CHF), endocarditis (infective and nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis), patent foramen ovale (PFO), left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). While robust data exist for antithrombotic use in conditions such as atrial fibrillation, optimal treatment in many situations remains under active investigation.

Comparison of antithrombotic strategies in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: an updated meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic ischemic stroke (CS) are at risk for stroke recurrence. The optimal antithrombotic strategy in patients who undergo medical management is still debated. METHODS: We systematically searched the literature for studies that reported on cerebrovascular event recurrences and/or death in patients with PFO treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC) or antiplatelet therapy (APT) for secondary prevention of CS. The efficacy endpoints were stroke recurrence and the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack or all-cause death. Major bleedings represented the safety endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies with 3953 patients (OAC = 1527, APT = 2426) were included. Weighted mean follow-up was 2.9 years. OAC was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of stroke compared with APT (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.44-0.95; ARR 2%, NNT 49), while no difference was found regarding the composite outcome (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.57-1.07) and the safety outcome (RR 1.57; 95% CI 0.85-2.90; p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: OAC was more effective than APT in reducing the risk of stroke recurrence in patients with PFO and CS, without a significant increase in the risk of major bleedings. Our findings support the need for further randomized data focused on the comparison of antithrombotic strategies in this setting.

Surgical vs. drug therapy in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of risk scoring for predicting stroke recurrence after percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure or medication therapy in patients with PFO and a history of cryptogenic stroke. METHODS: This study included 559 patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke who were treated in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2018 and were followed up for 15-72 months. After calculating the risk scores for stroke recurrence, we randomly divided the patients into two groups (ratio, 1:1): Patients in one group underwent PFO closure and those in the other received drug therapy. RESULTS: Patients in the PFO closure group had a lower risk of recurrent stroke than those in the drug therapy group (1.1% vs. 4.2%). Moreover, serious bleeding was less frequent in the PFO closure group than in the drug therapy group (0% vs. 3.2%), although the incidence of atrial fibrillation or flutter did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.67). Interestingly, a subgroup analysis revealed no inter-treatment group difference in the rate of cryptogenic stroke recurrence among patients with risk scores of 0-1. By contrast, PFO closure yielded superior outcomes among patients with risk scores of ≥2. CONCLUSION: Compared with drug therapy, PFO closure reduced the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a risk score of ≥2 and reduced the incidence of serious bleeding without increasing the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.

Acute limb ischemia due to paradoxical embolism treated with systemic thrombolysis.

We present a case report of a patient with acute upper and lower limb ischemia due to paradoxical embolism. A 67-year old woman without history of venous thromboembolism suffered dislocated patellar fracture requiring surgery in November 2017. Two months after surgery she presented to the emergency room with bilateral pulmonary embolism, occlusion of the left subclavian artery, left common femoral artery and superior mesenteric artery. Transesophageal echocardiography detected patent foramen ovale. Vascular surgeon decided against embolectomy, interventional radiologist against pharmacomechanical thrombolysis due to the extent of the occlusions. Systemic thrombolysis (alteplase) was administered successfully with resolution of the emboli in the left subclavian artery, left common femoral artery and superior mesenteric artery.

The role of device closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

One of the most frequent causes of cardiac embolism in cryptogenic stroke is a paradoxical embolus, which originate from systemic venous source though an unidentified patent foramen ovale (PFO). PFO is a common finding in the general population with a prevalence of 25% to 30%. Transcatheter PFO device closure is known to be feasible and safety treatment for such patients. In recent years, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to address the superiority of PFO closure over medical therapy alone in the prevention of stroke recurrence in patients with PFO. In contrast to findings from early 3 RCTs, recent 4 RCTs could successfully show the benefits of PFO device closure compared with medical therapy, with less peri- and postprocedural complication. Based on these data, PFO device closure is recommended to carefully select cryptogenic stroke patients aged from 18 to 65 years, with a high probability of a causal role of the PFO in stroke events. However, it is still uncertain whether PFO closure is superior to oral anticoagulants therapy in these patients. Therefore, further prospective randomized trials are needed to address the efficacy of PFO device closure to oral anticoagulants therapy.

Clopidogrel can be an effective complementary prophylactic for drug-refractory migraine with patent foramen ovale.

The present study aims to determine the potential prophylactic effect of clopidogrel for migraine with patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients who are poor responders to two or more common preventive medications. Migraineurs underwent contrast-enhanced transcranial doppler examination to confirm the presence of PFO and determine the right-to-left shunt degree. Clopidogrel 75 mg/day was added to the existing prophylactic regimen for 3 months and 6 months. The presence of PFO was found in 56.8% (151/266) of all patients with migraine and 70.2% (59/84) of migraine with aura (MHA), and among MHA a large shunt was observed in 36 patients. Twenty-six patients with drug-refractory migraine took clopidogrel 75 mg/day for 3 months. Compared with those at baseline, headache frequencies and attack durations were significantly lower (6.17±3.93/month (M) vs 3.28±2.67/M, p=0.003; 13.62±13.98/hour (H) vs 7.36±7.33/H, p=0.0049, respectively); visual analog scale scores and migraine disability assessment scores were also obviously decreased (6.32±1.97 vs 4.71±1.20, p<0.001; 22.14±7.13 vs 16.00±5.92, p=0.001, respectively). These improvements were maintained for 6 months in 12 patients. We concluded that PFO was closely correlated with migraine, especially in MHA. Clopidogrel could act as an effective complementary prophylactic for migraine with PFO in patients with poor response to routine prophylactics.

Aspirin or anticoagulation after cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Since closure has restrictive eligibility criteria, the vast majority of patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) receive medical treatment. However, the optimal antithrombotic strategy is still unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to define risk/benefit profile of anticoagulation compared with antiplatelet treatment in PFO-related stroke. METHODS: Systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019117559). Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL database (2000-2019) for RCTs randomly allocating patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO to medical treatment. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB tool. Main outcomes were stroke recurrence and major bleeding. RoPE score-dependent analysis was implemented to define a possible role for patient selection. RESULTS: Five RCTs met inclusion criteria (3 high-, 1 fair-, 1 poor-quality RCTs). Overall, meta-analysis included 1565 patients (mean age 55.5 years), 753 (48.1%) receiving anticoagulation. Compared with antiplatelet treatment, anticoagulation conveyed no net benefit in prevention of recurrent stroke (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.41-1.07, pheterogeneity = 0.46), and associated with a non-significant higher risk of major bleeding (OR = 1.64, 95% CI 0.79-3.43, pheterogeneity = 0.57). In patients with high RoPE score, anticoagulation significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.8, pheterogeneity = 0.88). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows that anticoagulation confers no net benefit in recurrent stroke prevention over antiplatelets in patients with PFO-related stroke. RoPE score might help in selecting patients benefiting from anticoagulation, but further trials are needed to delineate risk/benefit profile of anticoagulation.

Antiplatelet and Antithrombotic Therapy After Patent Foramen Oval and Atrial Septal Defect Closure.

Pathologies of the atrial septum include different interatrial communications varying from patent foramen ovale (PFO) to actual defects. Atrial septal defects (ASDs) may be localized within the fossa ovalis such as the secundum type ASD or outside the region of fossa ovalis, such as the ostium primum defect and sinus venosus defect. Over the last decades, the percutaneous closure of interatrial shunts has become a feasible and safe method. During these procedures, the delicate balance between thrombotic risk, device sealing process and bleeding risk is crucial. In this review, we sought to describe current available data on the antiplatelet and antithrombotic management of patients after percutaneous ASD or PFO closure.

Comparison of Antiplatelet Therapies for Prevention of Patent Foramen Ovale-Associated Stroke.

AIMS: The REDUCE study demonstrated a reduction in the risk of recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale closure and antiplatelet therapy compared to antiplatelet therapy alone. The clinicians were allowed to choose among aspirin, clopidogrel, or aspirin/dipyridamole with the expectation that all antiplatelet therapies would have similar efficacy in this population. We tested that presumption by comparing recurrent stroke rates among antiplatelet agents within the control arm of the trial. METHODS: We evaluated patients in REDUCE study who were randomized to the medical arm. The primary endpoint for this analysis was freedom from clinical ischemic stroke through at least 2 years of follow-up, to a maximum of 5 years. In the primary analysis, antiplatelet treatment was defined as the agent during the week prior to a recurrent stroke or last known contact. RESULTS: Of 223 patients in the medical treatment arm, the initial agent was aspirin 52%, clopidogrel 30%, and aspirin/dipyridamole 12%. Patients treated with aspirin were similar to those treated with alternatives, but were more likely to be enrolled in the United States. The last reported agent was aspirin alone in 55%, clopidogrel alone in 31%, aspirin/dipyridamole in 7%, and other/nothing/missing in 7%. Recurrent stroke rates were similar for all 3 antiplatelet regimens in unadjusted and adjusted analyses, with no overall difference among agents (P= .17). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with patent foramen ovale-associated stroke who were managed medically, there were no differences among antiplatelet agents in the risk of recurrent stroke, though confidence intervals were wide.